New to the forum? Sign Up Here! Already a member? Please login below.
|
|
||
As far as I know circumcision, is a good hygiene for men. It may be hard to do a sexual play because it needs the skin of the tip of the penis to be uncovered of the skin.But it is not true that it is hard to do only it is not lovable to the present society.It is unhygienic. |
|
||
I dont think this is true. |
|
||
Im uncircumcized and I asked my doctor whether or not i should get the procedure since my wife and I are having problems. However I was reassured by the RE that circumcision has nothing to do with the whole thing. |
|
||
I dont see why an uncirumcised male would have problems impregnating a woman. Circumcision just involves removing the foreskin... its just skin for cripe's sake! |
|
||
circumcision is just a hygiene. But in doing sex it can do as what the uncircumcised male do. So there nothing difference in circumcised male towards uncircumcised male in speaking of sexual play. |
|
||
Dont think so... I know a guy who is uncircumcised and he has like 2 kids now and in succession too. |
|
||
huh? ive never been with an uncircumcised man... but i think this is bull. i dont see how foreskin or lack thereof can cause infertility issues. |
|
||
No. This is really not true.There are certain country that did not practice circumcision but the men was able to impregnate their wives. Where did you get this idea? |
|
||
Im circumcised but that's not the problem and I dont think being curcumcised or not is an issue in infertility. |
|
||
I had a guy friend in Germany..he was not circumcised but he already has 3 children of his own from his legal wife.Not to mention his other children from his other not so legal wife. LOL! |